Hunan office-level official microblogging "seeking powder" netizens announced the release of property and then pay attention

What is the result of micro-blog “seeking for powder” by departmental officials? Recently, Xie Jianhui, director of Hunan Provincial Department of Commerce’s Xie Jianhui’s experience, showed that most people support the opening of microblogs by hall officials, but there are also the prerequisites for users to submit Weibo’s attention to the disclosure of property. As an official with a high Weibo rating in Hunan Province, Xie Jianhui said that her property can be made public, but currently the relevant organizations and departments do not have uniform regulations on the disclosure of official property, and she is not the first one to publicize (May 22). The Metro Times.

As a department-level official, Xie Jianhui is not only an official with a high level of Weibo in Hunan Province, but also actively “seeking for powder”. It can be said that he is both stylish and open-minded and is worthy of recognition. However, what the female director thought unexpectedly was that after she issued a request for “powder” through Weibo, she encountered “bargaining” by netizens. Some netizens even said that they could pay attention, but only if the family property was announced.

Xie Jianhui also gave a positive response to such “bargaining,” but her response may not be satisfactory to netizens, but it is understandable. After all, under the premise that there is no mandatory requirement, people who are reluctant to be the first to eat crabs can only depend on the parties' own wishes. No one has the right to ask others to eat crabs first.

In fact, the female director “seeking for powder” has profound implications behind netizens’ bargaining. First of all, does the opening of Weibo's “fighting for powder” by a female director and the release of personal property are related? Or is the publication of personal property a prerequisite for "pursuing powder?" The answer is of course negative. Then why do netizens also propose such "irrational demands"? This can only show that the majority of netizens are too expectant, too eager and too urgent for the publicity of official property, so as not to let go of any opportunity to express this appeal.

From this perspective, the netizen did not make such a request against the female director. It was only in the case of a "surprise coincidence" that the request fell on the head of the female director. Therefore, it is not the female director but the higher level government department that really should reflect on the netizen appeals. It is those departments and officials who have responsibilities and powers to make provisions and require officials to announce property.

The official property disclosure system has been rummaging for years, but the result is always thunderous and rainy. Some of the places that have tried in this area have been unsatisfactory in terms of degree and content, and they cannot truly meet public demands. It is also in the face of such a social reality, netizens only "wonderful ideas", to publish personal property and female director "for powder" bargain. It now appears that the female director is somewhat "innocent", but the demands of netizens are not unfair. So, where exactly is the problem? The answer is self-evident.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Prev: Cancer girl Ru Ruoqing suspected to be microblog message that will completely disappear